Table
of Contents
Study
Areas:
Slavery
Anti-Slavery
Free
Persons of Color
Underground
Railroad
The
Violent Decade
US
Colored Troops
Civil
War
|
Part
Three
Approaching Storms
Chapter
Seven
Rebellion
The
Pioneering Entrepreneurs
Freedom
from the bonds of slavery did not guarantee independence
from white influence for Harrisburg’s African Americans.
One of the key indicators of racial independence, as noted above,
was the ability to live free in a house or quarters not owned by
a white employer. By 1820, not only had the percentage of blacks
living free of white households grown, but the number of blacks
living in independent black households had more than tripled. This
is a significant accomplishment for Harrisburg’s black community
for two reasons. First, it shows the trend of independence from
white influence to be solidly rising over a ten-year period. Second,
it gives evidence that Harrisburg blacks were gaining economic
power along with social independence.
The
arrangement of bed and board for a live-in servant ultimately benefited
the employer, who deducted the cost of the living arrangement from
wages earned by the servant and used the arrangement as a hook to keep
the servant on site at all hours. This severely limited the free time
available to the servant, and thus limited their social interactions
and ability to earn money independently in their free time. It was
the most common living arrangement for free African Americans in this
region through 1800, and therefore served to keep them highly dependent
on white citizens.
Through
1810, at least, the only option of escaping this cycle of dependence
was to find lodging away from the employer, which was difficult because
it required not only enough extra money to pay rent, but it also meant
the servant had to find someone willing to host the lodger at a meager
rate. A few fortunate African American families in Harrisburg were
independent enough, by the end of this first decade of the nineteenth
century, to be able to rent a house in Harrisburg, into which they
allowed a few boarders as a way to supplement the household income.
This gesture of practicality and hospitality became the first step
toward financial independence for those servants lucky enough to secure
such an arrangement. Such families, however, were a rarity in 1810,
and the process of gaining independence proceeded at a slow rate.
Sometime
between 1816 and 1821, however, the balance tipped toward a sufficient
supply of independent housing for African Americans living in and arriving
in Harrisburg. Two men in particular were responsible for this change,
and they represented a new and dynamic type of African American resident
of Harrisburg: the African American entrepreneur.
Zeke
Carter
Ezekiel “Zeke” Carter
came to Harrisburg as a youthful free African American man from Talbot
County, Maryland about 1800. Life for free African Americans in the
Chesapeake region in 1800 was very difficult, and many found their
lives as severely limited as those of their enslaved brethren did.
Their numbers increased greatly after the Revolutionary War, and by
1800, there were 20,000 free blacks in that state. Facing very bleak
chances for advancement, many young people took to the road when they
saw their chance, heading north to seek their fortune in the towns
and cities of Pennsylvania.16
Carter
was a wood sawyer by trade, in the prime of his life at twenty-six
years of age when he arrived in Harrisburg, and like the rest of Harrisburg’s
free blacks that year he apparently found work and lodging through
a white employer. Unlike the situation in his native Talbot County,
a growing Harrisburg presented the young and ambitious Ezekiel Carter
with numerous opportunities for personal advancement. He found plenty
of work as a sawyer, supplying the hardwoods for Harrisburg’s
numerous stoves and ovens. The work was hard, and involved converting
a heap of oak or hickory logs and cordwood dumped in the street in
front of a home into neatly stacked billets cut to size to fit in the
stove.
As
a sawyer, Zeke Carter took advantage of being able to talk to the housewives
and shopkeepers as he worked, and discovered that there were other
opportunities to provide needed services. He acquired the use of a
cart and found work hauling items through the borough streets. During
the summer, when rain barrels ran dry from lack of precipitation and
housewives found the local well water too hard to use for laundry,
Zeke Carter hauled river water in barrels to the borough’s dry
households at fifty cents per barrel.
Zeke
Carter’s most lucrative operation, though, was chimney sweeping.
Prior to the regular shipment of coal by raft down the Susquehanna
River from Wilkes-Barre, the fuel of necessity in Harrisburg stoves
and fireplaces was wood. The same wood that Zeke Carter turned from
rough logs to neatly stacked cords, once it had heated a home or baked
a loaf of bread, left volumes of ash in the firebox and residues of
creosote and soot in the chimney. The ash had to be removed before
another fire could be made, and the soot residue had to be scoured
out of the chimney by hand regularly, or it would build up in volume
and eventually catch fire.
A
fire inside of the chimney was a frightening and truly dangerous event;
it was difficult to put out and was capable of burning the entire structure
to the ground. Even if a fire did not occur, a dirty chimney lacked
the draft needed for an efficient fire. Most of the chimneys in Harrisburg
houses were large, and cleaning them was extremely messy. Carter began
to offer chimney sweeping, and employed local African American boys
to do the work. The young boys “were on the street early in the
morning before people made their fires, singing their peculiar songs,
and when employed to clean a chimney, entering at the fireplace, after
reaching the top of the chimney sung a short impromptu song to let
people know that they had reached the top.”17
By
1810, “Zikel Carter” was listed as the head of an independent
African American household consisting of five people. Unfortunately,
the census forms in 1810 did not break down the non-white free residents
by age and sex, so we cannot be sure the other four persons were family
members, but this seems likely considering Ezekiel Carter was now in
his mid-thirties and had been in town long enough to court and marry
a local woman. He had three children, one of whom, Ezekiel Jr., married
a Harrisburg woman named Mary Wilson, in November 1832. So it is possible
that the other four African Americans of this household are his wife
and three children.
His
household was located near two other free African American households,
those of Robert Carr (with four people) and John Battis (with five
people). These homes were clustered in the block bordered by Third
and Fourth streets and between Market and Walnut streets, situated
on the northern limits of the town in 1810. Running east and west through
the center of this block was Strawberry Alley, which was where Carter
was located.
The
location in its earliest years was not in ideal one. The block was
considerably removed from the town’s business center, which was
still concentrated along Front Street. And because it had been only
ten years since the swampy ground at Second and Market was filled in
and stabilized, businesses were just beginning to move to the east
along Mulberry Street, Second Street, and into Market Square.
There
was a large tan yard adjoining the public ground on Walnut Street,
which would have regularly blanketed the neighboring block with the
strong odors associated with the tanning of animal hides. The land
itself between Market and Walnut streets was marshy, and runoff collected
into a stream east of Fourth Street that drained into Paxton Creek.
To
the north, the “public ground” that bordered this neighborhood,
set aside by John Harris for use of the state, was considered by townspeople
to be literally for public use. It was a source of gravel and loam
sand, and “consequently it was full of gravel pits and sand holes
in all directions.” Construction of the new capitol building
took place on the neighboring site between 1819 and 1821. In the course
of the next ten years, though, this block became a center of African
American community life for Harrisburg, providing jobs, shelter, social
opportunities, and inspiration to those who looked for a way out of
the cycle of dependence and poverty that had been fostered by a century
of slavery.18
Ezekiel
Carter’s chimney sweeping business supported his family, provided
jobs, and most importantly to the local African American community,
allowed the ambitious wood sawyer from the shores of the Chesapeake
to strive for greater accomplishments. He had arrived in Harrisburg
when the borough was only about fifteen years old and right from the
start he had prospered. He witnessed the steady growth of the young
town and, as one of the first free African Americans in the borough
to acquire an independent household, quickly grasped the value of controlling
property as a means of building wealth.
With
the earnings from his various enterprises, he had, by 1807, purchased
one or more “houses” on Strawberry Alley, and began to
rent space out to newly arriving African Americans. This move completely
changed the dynamic of white employer-African American servant relationships
in Harrisburg because it provided a place for blacks to stay other
than in the household of their employer. Instead of being bound by
the constricting confines, hours, and rules of living inside a white
employer’s house, African Americans could stay at “Zech’s
House” in Strawberry Alley and retain some of their independence,
for a price.
This
was a tremendous boon to this segment of the local work force, the
ones most likely to have the laboring jobs and the dimmest prospects,
because for the first time they had options. Prior to this, servants
who were in a bad employment situation were often forced to stay because
they had nowhere else to go. Once Zeke Carter began providing space
to local African Americans, it removed much of the power previously
held by the town’s white employers over their African American
servants.
This
opportunity was even more valuable for newly arriving African Americans,
as it gave them a place to stay while they considered their options.
Ezekiel Carter’s boarding house was located in the heart of a
growing African American community, providing new arrivals to the borough
access to social opportunities, news, and jobs, three of the most valuable
tools for building a new life.
The
popularity of his boarding houses—he appears to have been operating
two or more houses, including one on Market Street by 1822—is
seen in the list of people registered by the borough constable as staying
with him. In 1821, as noted above, Harrisburg passed an ordinance requiring
all “free persons of color” to register with the chief
burgess. From the surviving registration dockets, nineteen people registered
their address in one of the African American boarding houses controlled
by Carter either in Strawberry Alley or on Market Street.19 Carter
was prosperous enough by 1825 that, when twenty local men were indicted
for riot in the attempted rescue of the fugitive slave at the courthouse
in April, he was the only African American property holder in Harrisburg
with sufficient cash available to come forward and post bail for one
of the rioters.
John
Battis
Very
near Carter’s house and business was the home of John Battis,
who operated a rival chimney sweeping business from his Walnut Street
location. Battis was in the town of Harrisburg as early as 1810, being
enumerated in the census that year as “Bets” or “Betz.” By
1820, John Battis’ household was very large, consisting of nine
individuals, predominantly young and male. When he registered with
the chief burgess the following year, Battis listed only himself, his
wife Nancy and one-year-old son James as family.
These
other young men in his household were probably sweeps in his business.
Like Zeke Carter, John Battis offered newly arrived African Americans
a place to stay and employment in his business. The 1821 Registry of
free African Americans shows that fourteen persons other than his immediate
family were staying with John Battis on Walnut Street. Five of the
persons registered at Battis’ house were named Johnston, three
of whom were David Johnston, his wife Marie and their eighteen-month-old
child, all from Philadelphia. Also at Battis’ house was one other
married couple, George Colly and his wife, and seven other single young
men.
In
contrast, Zeke Carter’s houses sheltered five families, four
of which had at least one child, and only two single persons, one male
and one female. Carter and Battis do not appear to have reserved their
rooms specifically for either local or visiting persons. In all the
houses, the renters and boarders represented a mix of local and newly
arrived persons, some from nearby counties, and some from outside of
Pennsylvania.
There
were other African American businessmen, in addition to Ezekiel Carter
and John Battis, who allowed workers to share their families’ homes.
Whitewasher William White and his wife Susanna, from Philadelphia,
shared their Market Street residence with James and John Kelly, both
of whom were also registered as whitewashers. John Kelly had come from
Maryland, but James Kelly’s state of birth was not mentioned.
In
some cases, a variety of boarders shared the same house, despite having
no common trade or place of origin. On Front Street, George Parker
was listed as a “mettelrite by trate” in a house owned
by Robert Harris. Another tradesman, weaver Lot Stout, and his wife
Louisa, lived in the same house with Parker. The Stouts were from Delaware,
but had been in Harrisburg for three years already, as servants of
Henry Hamilton. James Powell, of Maryland, also lived in this house,
as did two women from neighboring Pennsylvania counties: Elizabeth
King of York County, and Mary Sanders of Cumberland County.20
Robert
Harris was living in the mansion house during this time, but he also
owned houses along South Front and South Second streets. All these
people were registered as residing in one of Robert Harris’ Front
Street houses. As Robert Harris maintained a very large farm that extended
from around South Front Street below the mansion, eastward out modern
day Paxton Street as far as the current site of Mount Calvary Cemetery,
at Thirteenth Street, the aforementioned persons could have been occupying
one of his farm houses, possibly even the log house at Paxton and Race
Streets that had been built by Robert Harris’ father, John Harris
II, before construction of the stone mansion.
That
building earlier had been an inn, The Black Horse Tavern, one of several
inns operating near Front and Paxton streets that catered to the many
travelers crossing the Susquehanna by ferry. Prior to the opening of
the Market Street Bridge in 1817, this neighborhood was one of the
prime business districts of the borough, but once the bridge opened
and the popularity of the ferry waned, this area experienced a downturn.
What was bad for local businessmen, however, was good for local free
African Americans, who could now afford to board in rooms and houses
in this neighborhood.21
James
McClintock
The
James McClintock family first appeared as an independent African American
household in Harrisburg in 1820, as enumerated by the census taker
that year, with a household that included thee male children and one
female child. From the borough registration dockets for African Americans
citizens, recorded in 1821, we know that James McClintock and his wife
Lydia resided on Third Street. We also know that James was earning
his living as a barber, an occupation that would be dominated by African
American residents in Harrisburg for the next several decades. James
McClintock was the only barber noted on the African American registry,
and is possibly the first professional African American barber in town.
He would be joined in short order by numerous other African American
barbers who frequently set up shop at street level inside of some of
the town’s prominent hotels in order to serve the white citizenry
of the borough. Several generations of McClintocks would follow James
in the family business.
In
1821, the McClintock household made room for a boarder: a newly freed
slave. Belle Buey, a slave belonging to James Alricks at his home in
Fermanagh Township, Juniata County, was brought by Alricks from Juniata
to Perry County, and then to Harrisburg some time before 1815 “where
he entered mercantile pursuits.” After her association with Alricks
ended, Buey found housing with the McClintock family. It appears that
James McClintock prospered in his business fairly quickly, as by 1825
he had become the wealthiest of the town’s six African American
property holders, being taxed for six properties.
Despite
having such a large stake in property, and being the responsible head
of a thriving household, James McClintock risked all these things to
participate in the rescue operation in 1825. He was easily identified
as a participant and was arrested almost immediately thereafter, but
was apparently not significantly harmed by the outcome of the trial.
Perhaps he was one of the eight men released by the authorities, and
escaped punishment on the treadmill. By 1830, he was again listed at
the head of his household, and had managed to maintain his wealth.
George
Chester
Another
African American businessman who made his appearance in Harrisburg
about this time was George Chester. Chester is first found in the census
of 1820, in which he appears as the head of an independent African
American household of three people: one male and one female adult,
and one male child. This small family unit matches the entry for the
Chesters one year later, in the town’s registry of free African
Americans. In that docket, George Chester, his wife Hanna, and seven-year-old
child are all shown as residing in Dewberry Alley, in Harrisburg.
George
told the record taker that he had been born in Maryland, and that he
served his time with Thomas Collins in that state. Hanna Chester, his
wife at the time, was also from Maryland. Chester would have been about
thirty-seven years old by the time he registered his family with Chief
Burgess Fahnestock. Significantly, Chester listed his occupation as
the keeper of an “oyster shop.”22 George
Chester’s oysters, and the restaurant in which he served these
and other locally favored foods, would become quite popular and would
soon play a prominent role in the development of abolitionist strategies
by Harrisburg anti-slavery activists.
These
early steps toward African American independence in Harrisburg were
also important to the anti-slavery struggle in this town, which began
to take the form of organized resistance fueled by the increased freedoms
and resources. The progression from providing independent, impulsive
aid to a fugitive slave, to organized resistance against the slave
powers was a slow and painful process however, full of sacrifice and
risk.
As
noted earlier, the area around the ferry had been attracting runaway
slaves since the middle of the previous century. Virginia slave Jerry
Arthur escaped from his owners in December 1799 and, according to a
published ad, was believed headed for Harrisburg. Whether he ever made
it to the town is not known, but if he did, and if he managed to make
contact with one of the town’s African American residents, it
would have been a major undertaking for them to shelter and feed him
at that time. Few had access to the necessary resources, being still
dependant on white employers for their own food and shelter. Had they
been caught in the act of aiding a fugitive slave at this time, they
would have faced extremely harsh consequences, including possible imprisonment
and loss of freedom. Yet fugitive slaves continued to come through
Harrisburg and generally continued to escape detection, somehow surviving
to continue on their journey. Their survival can only be explained
by accepting that they found some sort of aid in town, whether it was
temporary shelter, food, clothing or directions.
White
residents of Harrisburg in 1800 and even in 1810 were not likely to
have provided any of these necessary provisions, leaving the town’s
black residents as the only likely providers. Ten years later, as the
movement toward independent housing became more certain, the task of
aiding fugitive slaves became easier, although no less risky.
Southern
slaveholders were aware that their slaves were finding safe harbor
in town, because they bought runaway advertisements in the local newspapers
in hopes of alerting Harrisburg’s white citizenry to their possible
presence. These runaway ads appeared frequently in such newspapers
as the Harrisburg Republican, which even at this late date
was running local advertisements from Harrisburg slaveholders offering
slaves for sale. An ad appeared in that paper on 11 August 1820, offering
to sell “the time of a black boy, nearly eight years old, bound
to serve until he is twenty-one; his time will be sold cheap.” One
month prior, on 7 July, the same newspaper ran copy that advertised “the
time of a black Girl, who has about 5 years to serve.” Neither
advertiser would include his or her name, leaving instructions for
interested parties to “inquire of the printer.”
To
local free African American residents, these advertisements, along
with the runaway ads for Virginia and Maryland slaves, must have been
highly frustrating and probably even frightening, being grim reminders
of the perilous nature of their own freedoms. As more and more fugitive
slaves made their way from southern plantations to the alleys of Harrisburg,
and as the demands of southern slaveholders and politicians became
shriller in their call for penalties and punishment, local blacks found
that they had to make a choice in order to protect their families,
their freedoms, and their futures. A haphazard approach to sheltering
runaways was insufficient in the face of the increasing numbers of
fugitives, and especially in the face of increasing incursions by slave
hunters. The potential for violence was becoming manifest with each
passing week. They could either endure the status quo of a European-American
dominated society that accepted the servitude of blacks, and ally themselves
with the majority of Harrisburg’s white citizenry against, or
at least with indifference to, the influx of southern freedom seekers,
or they could continue to resist the slave powers and thereby place
all their hard won freedoms in certain peril. There was no middle ground.
By
the second decade of the nineteenth century, for Harrisburg’s
African American community, it all came down to a choice of submission
or rebellion. But there really was no choice. Their response to this
atmosphere of brutal racial oppression was one of active, but covert,
organized resistance.
Previous |
Next
Notes
16. In his study
of free African Americans in the Chesapeake region before, during,
and after the Revolutionary War, historian Philip D. Morgan pointed
out the decreased opportunities for free blacks in Maryland in the
post war years. Citing the mass manumission of slaves by slaveholders,
who were switching from tobacco to grain production, Morgan notes, “Although
the free black population of the Chesapeake expanded after the Revolution,
its members did not grow apart from slaves…the relatively small
size of Chesapeake towns limited the migratory possibilities of recently
manumitted blacks. For the most part, then, Chesapeake free blacks
remained in their old neighborhoods. They often worked alongside slaves,
many of whom were being hired out, as tidewater planters responded
to the new demands of grain cultivation. A hired salve embraced some
of freedom’s attributes, if not its substance. In another way,
therefore, the gap between free black and slave narrowed rather than
widened.” Philip D. Morgan, Slave Counterpoint: Black Culture
in the Eighteenth-century Chesapeake and Lowcountry (Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 490.
17. Egle, Notes
and Queries, 3rd ser., vol. 1, 12:68.
18. Bureau of
the Census, Third Census of the United States, 1810, Borough of Harrisburg,
Dauphin County, Pennsylvania; Egle, Notes and Queries, 1st
and 2nd ser., vol. 2, 72:392-393; 3rd ser., vol. 1, 45:367; Annual
Volume 1897, 11:61.
This pioneering African American community in Harrisburg, which was intermixed
with white families and businesses, was roughly centered in the block
that is now the modern day business center known as Strawberry Square.
19. “Harrisburg
Registry of Free African Americans, 1821,” Borough Docket, 7
May 1821, Archives of the City of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
20. Ibid.
21. Pennsylvania
Gazette, 4 March 1762.
Paxton Street was one of the principal routes in and out of Harrisburg,
and connected the river town, via Lancaster, to Philadelphia. Prior to
the founding of Harrisburg, it was known as the Paxton Road or the Harris
Ferry Road. Egle, Notes and Queries, 3rd ser., vol. 3, 173:40.
22. “Harrisburg
Registry of Free African Americans, 1821.” Slave ownership data
on James Alricks is from Ellis Franklin, History of that part of
the Susquehanna and Juniata valleys, embraced in the counties of Mifflin,
Juniata, Perry, Union and Snyder, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia:
Everts, Peck and Richards, 1886), 678-679. Alricks’ arrival in
Harrisburg is from Egle, Notes and Queries, 1st and 2nd ser.,
vol. 1, 45:318. Tax information for James McClintock is cited in Eggert, “Two
Steps Forward,” 9, and Houts, “Black Harrisburg’s
Resistance to Slavery,” 11.
Houts lists James McClintock’s property as “three houses,
two half-lots and a stable.” One possibility regarding the place
of origin for George Chester, based upon the location and approximate
year of servitude to his former owner, is in Worcester County, Maryland,
where Thomas Collins is listed in the county census as a slaveholder
as late as 1810. If Chester was born in 1784 and manumitted at the traditional
age of 28, he would have been free by 1812, which allows for his appearance
in Harrisburg between the 1810 and 1820 censuses with a wife and seven-year-old
child.
|