|   Table
              of Contents Study
            Areas: Slavery Anti-Slavery Free
            Persons of Color Underground
            Railroad The
            Violent Decade  US
            Colored Troops Civil
            War  
     |   Chapter
            TenThe Bridge (continued)
  The
            Master Spirit of the Negro War ElementAt
            nine o’clock p.m. on Monday, 9 March, the evening
            mail train from Pittsburgh pulled into the ornate brick and stone
            Pennsylvania Railroad depot on Market Street in Harrisburg. The engine
            sat steaming in the cool March temperatures as the crew of the train
            worked to take in more fuel and water for the next leg of the trip.
            Railroad employees unloaded the sacks of mail that originated in
            the west, and loaded sacks bound for destinations to the east.  Among
          the passengers that climbed down from the cars onto the passenger platform
          were fourteen African American men, a few wearing the blue wool army
          uniform of the North. They stood out among the other travelers by their
          demeanor and build, not to mention their uniforms, which were easily
          distinguishable even in the dim light from the gas lamps that illuminate
          the platform and lined Market Street.  A
          considerable stir began among the depot workers, some of whom were
          African American locals, and word quickly spread through the city of
          the arrival of a number of black troops. One of the men wore the insignia
          of an officer, and after inquiring about local accommodations, led
          his men across the street to a hotel whose owner was affable to providing
          black men with a little something to wash the taste of locomotive soot
          from their throats.  They
          were greeted in the street and in the hotel, during their brief stay,
          by local black residents, for whom the appearance of the Pittsburgh
          volunteers was an unexpected and welcome sight. Here the Patriot
          and Union picked up the story: 
        Quite a number of “American
              citizens of African descent” belonging to this city paid
              their respects to the distinguished visitors, and gave them a warm
              and hearty greeting. We learn that the effort making here to secure
              negro recruits is not meeting with that success our Abolition friends
              desire, and the probabilities are that the whole thing will fizzle
              out. In Pittsburgh the greatest exertions are being made to raise
              a regiment of sable soldiers, but so far their efforts have only
              secured the paltry fourteen that passed through this city on Monday
              evening.32 Although the
          Democratic editor of the Patriot and Union was being heavily
          sarcastic by referring to the fourteen African American soldiers as “distinguished
          visitors,” the appellation was particularly apt as far as local
          blacks were concerned. This was the first time during the war that
          the city had seen uniformed African American recruits, and not just
          army drovers, wagoners and other workers who wore the Union blue.  Although
          local whites may have been dismayed to see these men marching from
          the depot to the local restaurant for refreshments while the train
          was readied for its run east, the sight was a perfect sensation for
          Harrisburg’s African American residents. Here was the living,
          breathing, beer-drinking embodiment of everything they had imagined
          when the idea of African American troops was first advanced in the
          early years of the war. For a few glorious moments, they could talk
          to them, clap them on the back and wish them well, sit down with them,
          and maybe even buy a drink for them before they walked back to their
          eastbound train.  By the end
          of the next week, though, Harrisburg’s African American community
          could proudly boast that it, too, was sending its sons and husbands
          to Boston to join the Fifty-Fourth regiment. The appearance of the
          Pittsburgh men must have finally sparked an outcry to establish a recruiting
          station in the capital city, and once that happened, it drew an immediate
          response. A number of Harrisburg men came forward to speak with T.
          Morris Chester, who took the lead in the local recruiting effort, about
          the Massachusetts regiment, and of those whose spirit was willing,
          Chester and his co-recruiter John Wolf found their first recruits: 
        On Saturday morning
              Sergeant Thomas M. Chester, the master spirit of the negro war
              element in our midst, left here with six or eight stalwart “American
              citizens of African descent,” recruited for a Massachusetts
              regiment. He left a sable sergeant in charge of the recruiting
              station during his absence, who has succeeded in enlisting more
              negroes for the same regiment, and they will also be sent forward
              in the course of a few days.33 On Tuesday,
          17 March, a local newspaper reported, “Another squad of negro
          soldiers, recruited in the western section of the State for a Massachusetts
          regiment, passed through this city yesterday. The sable sons of Mars
          were in full uniform and looked quite ferocious.” Whether this
          group of recruits aroused the same interest among the city’s
          black residents, as did the first group, is not mentioned. The newspaper
          did credit the work of T. Morris Chester in the local recruitment work,
          noting: “The zealous and ambitious Tom Chester, of this city,
          is working hard to get up a company, with the view of being commissioned
          as captain, and no doubt he will succeed.” 34  Although
          he no doubt cringed at being identified as “Tom Chester,” the
          newspaper editor, in his disparagement of Chester’s motivation,
          was accurate in assessing his ambitions. Thomas Morris Chester indeed
          had dreams of leading an African American regiment as an officer. Although
          he knew that the planned Massachusetts regiments were to be led only
          by white officers, Chester also knew that the inequities in pay and
          bounty—black soldiers would be paid only ten dollars per month,
          with a monthly deduction of three dollars for equipment, as compared
          with the thirteen dollars and no deductions paid monthly to white recruits—were
          being assailed by the New England abolitionists who backed the regiments,
          and the pay issue was under review by Governor Andrew. Chester probably
          also hoped that the ban on black officers would also be reviewed and
          lifted, and he was working to be in a prime position to be appointed
          to one of those spots.35  By the end
          of March, excitement in the city over seeing African American men passing
          through, or volunteering locally for the Massachusetts regiments was,
          in the words of the Patriot and Union editor, “played
          out.” Ever eager to show the folly in enlisting African Americans
          into the armed forces, the Democratic press happily published articles
          about the slow recruiting efforts almost weekly. Unfortunately for
          those seeking to fill the ranks of the Fifty-Fourth regiment, the reports
          were not substantially exaggerated. On 25 March, the Patriot and
          Union pronounced the local recruitment push “a failure”: 
        The effort of the Abolitionists
              to get up a negro regiment is likely to prove a failure. After
              all the drumming up that has been done in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania
              and New York, only two hundred and fifty-four recruits have been
              obtained. Great inducements are offered to negroes to enlist, but
              they “don’t see it.” Tom Chester, of this city,
              undertook to raise a company, with the view of being commissioned
              as captain, but finding that he couldn’t make his point,
              abandoned the effort. There is no fight in the niggers, and they
              can’t be got into the ranks of the army except by conscription.36 The next day,
          the same newspaper reported on the supposed reason that most of Harrisburg’s
          black men were shunning Chester’s advocacy of the Massachusetts
          Governor’s opportunity to fight in his regiment. It printed a
          story it heard about the retort made by one local African American
          man to the Massachusetts recruiter who tried to enlist him. He supposedly
          told the recruiter that he, and his fellow Harrisburg blacks, had nothing
          to do with the war, making the allusion “two dogs fight over
          a bone—did you ever see the bone fight?”37 The
          editor clearly wanted to ascribe the same motives to the local black
          community that matched his political views: that the war was not about
          slavery, as the President’s Proclamation announced, or even over “social
          equality doctrines” (as it termed African American rights), but
          was a basic fight over states rights.  In the view
          of the Democratic press, blacks were simply being pushed into the fight
          by desperate abolitionists. To prove its point, the Patriot and
          Union editor juxtaposed articles about fights between local African
          American and white citizens with the recruiting articles, to highlight
          the supposed socially corrosive effects of elevating blacks to the
          social status of whites by allowing them to enlist in the military.
          Along with the article on the Pittsburgh recruitment efforts, it ran
          an article under the headline “Irrepressible Conflict”: 
        The “Irrepressible
              Conflict” between whites and blacks still goes on. Yesterday
              a stalwart “American of African descent,” employed
              as a porter at the White Hall hotel, was assaulted by a white man
              who struck him on the head with a solid “dornick,” inflicting
              an ugly gash from which the blood flowed in such a profuse stream
              as to completely saturate his clothing. The assault was provoked
              by alleged insolence on the part of the negro, who “put on
              airs” and indulged in language that the white man wouldn’t
              submit to. Scenes of this description, now of frequent occurrence,
              will become still more numerous in this and other northern cities.38 A day later
          the Patriot and Union followed with another article about
          an assault on a local African American citizen who “perambulated
          the streets, flourishing a loaded cane and insulting “white trash.” When
          he was challenged and belittled by a group of young white men on Third
          Street, he “indulged in defiant language and assumed a defensive
          attitude,” but was chased down into Blackberry Alley, where a
          white passerby came to his defense, but was subsequently frightened
          off with threats from the gang of street toughs.  The Patriot
            and Union called upon “good law-abiding citizens to frown
            upon such lawless proceedings,” even though it laid blame for
            instigating the incident upon the black man for his “provocation” of
            the street gang. This led to a bit of editorializing on what the
            editor saw as the true cause of the trouble, which was abolitionism: 
        The frequent outrages
              of this kind occurring here and elsewhere furnish unmistakable
              evidence of an “irrepressible conflict” between the
              white and black races, engendered by the Abolition policy of emancipating
              the negro slaves and elevating the whole African race in this country
              to social and political equality with white citizens. And if the
              present policy of the Abolition agents prevails, this “conflict” will
              go on, just as certainly as effect follows cause, until all negroes
              shall have been driven beyond the borders of the free States or
              totally exterminated.39 T. Morris
          Chester’s job got considerably tougher as March progressed. Republican
          politician William Henry Seward delivered the phrase “irrepressible
          conflict between opposing and enduring forces” in an 1858 speech
          to represent what he viewed as the inevitable economic clash between
          a slaveholding nation and a free-labor nation. Once war came, the Democratic
          press gleefully turned the phrase on its head to represent what they
          viewed as the inevitable violent showdown for dominance between whites
          and blacks—a showdown that they believed was precipitated by
          the policies of emancipation and military enlistment.  In Harrisburg,
          those clashes were of a minor character through the winter months,
          generally involving isolated fights between a few people, with the
          African Americans usually ending up as the victims. Such reports were
          served up as morality tales for the opponents of abolition, supposedly
          pointing out the evils and pitfalls that awaited any African American
          residents foolish enough to “put on airs” and act as if
          they had the same rights as local white residents.  While such
          incidents were a nuisance, an insult, and even a danger when they left
          local African American residents with physical injuries, they were
          still isolated and involved few people. With the coming of spring,
          however, the potential for violence increased along with the numbers
          of soldiers who reported for duty at Camp Curtin. Many of those soldiers
          carried the same views as the editors of the Patriot and Union,
          and most, when they inevitably encountered Harrisburg’s black
          residents, kept their views to themselves and avoided trouble. A few,
          though, were unable to stifle their words or actions, and very soon
          found their “irrepressible conflict.” 
 South Street Heats UpSpring 1863
          arrived in Harrisburg in a typically cold and rainy fashion, perhaps
          even colder and rainier than usual, causing local newspaper editors
          to comment, at the end of March at the atypical lack of budding evident
          in area trees. The abundant rains had swelled local streams, which
          in turn fed the Susquehanna River to the point that, by the last weekend
          of March, it was threatening to overflow its banks, as was its habit.
          Driftwood covered the waters that flowed swiftly past the capital city,
          reminding residents that the large rafts of timber from the northern
          counties along the West Branch would soon be making an appearance.40  Soldiers
          were again filtering into Camp Curtin, many of them newly recruited
          over the winter by agents sent home from their regiments for just such
          a purpose. One of them, an apparently contentious private named J.
          M. Sweeny, wandered into the rather rough neighborhood behind the State
          Capitol building, and got into an argument with local barber Thomas
          Early.  The cause
          of their argument is not known, but it was severe enough that it quickly
          degenerated into a physical confrontation that spilled out onto South
          Street. A crowd had no sooner gathered around the two feuding men when
          Sweeney pulled out a billy club and whacked Early hard enough on the
          head to draw blood. This was a severe mistake for the lone soldier,
          who was vastly outnumbered by the friends and acquaintances of the
          forty-five-year-old barber and long time city resident.  Sweeny was
          quickly overwhelmed by a number of men in the crowd, who beat him with
          clubs, stones, and whatever was handy and heavy. A number of women
          in the crowd cheered on the men who were beating the soldier, telling
          them, “Here’s a razor, cut his damned heart out.” The
          spectators surrounding the fight rapidly increased to a mob of more
          than a hundred, as people ran to the scene to see what all the excitement
          and yelling was about. Within moments the fight between a lone soldier
          and a lone resident of South Street had escalated to a near riot that
          quickly drew the attention of the police.  Bernard “Barney” Campbell
          was in his first day on the job as Harrisburg’s new chief of
          police, having just been appointed by the newly elected Mayor Augustus
          L. Roumfort. The new mayor, a Democrat, had taken office only days
          before and had just finished pledging before City Council to make the
          city’s safety his top priority. To underscore his sincerity,
          Roumfort announced the appointment of Campbell, a thirty-one-year-old
          native of Ireland, to the position of chief of police.  When news
          of the brawl in South Street reached the Mayor’s office in the
          Exchange Building on Walnut Street, a distance of only a few city blocks,
          Campbell dutifully raced to the scene with a handful of officers in
          support. When Campbell arrived, he found “hundreds of spectators
          of all colors and ages” surrounding the knot of struggling men,
          with many of those at the core of the conflict screaming to the fighters
          to inflict even more damage. The new police chief waded into the fray
          himself, physically disentangling people in order to get to the center
          of the fight. His men followed and “with some difficulty” the
          tumult was finally quieted.  Campbell
          found the soldier, who was severely beaten and profusely bleeding from
          deep razor cuts, and immediately had him taken to the office of a nearby
          doctor. He then ordered his men to arrest the three African American
          men he had seen beating the soldier. They were taken before Alderman
          Kline for a hearing, but when Kline heard their stories about how Sweeny
          had struck first, he decided not to charge them with any crimes and
          let them go home.  Meanwhile,
          Campbell and his men had their hands full just keeping order in the
          neighborhood of South Street, as a large number of soldiers had by
          now made their appearance, having heard that one of their comrades
          had gotten himself into considerable trouble.41 Once
          the sun began to set, however, tempers cooled along with the air temperature,
          and people turned toward home and camp to nurse wounds and, unfortunately,
          grudges.  The feud
          continued on Sunday night, as the bandaged Sweeny, at the behest of
          a local white man named Adam Kremer, pressed charges against seven
          African American residents of the South Street area. Charged with riot
          and assault and battery with intent to kill were Thomas Early, Jacob
          Lee, Jacob Jones, Boyd Jackson, Zachariah Johnson, Samuel Bennett,
          and Ann Greenley. Unlike Friday afternoon, the charges were not dismissed
          this time, and each of the seven accused rioters was forced to post
          four hundred dollars bail.42  The arrests
          may have been made in retaliation for a different incident that happened
          the night of the arrests, when a different drunken soldier ventured
          onto South Street and ended up being beaten by a number of black men
          in the neighborhood. From the newspaper report of the second incident
          in the same location, it appears that the second soldier had come to
          the African American neighborhood with revenge on his mind, but instead
          encountered more resistance than he had anticipated.  Unfortunately,
          a number of the more naive soldiers in camp believed the articles that
          they read almost daily in their local Democratic newspapers about the
          supposed cowardice of African Americans, and, after an afternoon of
          drinking, allowed bravado to overcome reason, and they set out for
          Harrisburg’s African American neighborhoods to prove their own
          valor.  After numerous
          incidents like this, and with few police available in those neighborhoods
          to intercept the drunken crusaders,43 local
          residents had finally had enough of the abuse, both verbal and physical,
          and they simply started giving the uniformed invaders a good drubbing.
          This defensive action was what the Patriot and Union characterized
          as “insolence on the part of the negro,” an assessment
          shared by the newly elected mayor and chief of police, and which resulted
          in the arrest of community leaders, such as Samuel Bennett, Thomas
          Early, Zachariah Johnson—all of whom were leaders at the Bethel
          A.M.E. on Watch Night—because of the misadventures of a few drunken
          soldiers.   Loss of Two
          LeadersThe black
          community suffered another blow on the day after Easter, with the death
          of the Reverend Charles C. Gardiner, pastor of the Second Presbyterian
          Church. His health had been failing for some time, but his tireless
          spirit overcame any limitations, so that his congregation probably
          thought he would be around almost forever.  At eighty-one
          years old, his obituary noted, “Brother Gardiner was one of the
          oldest Presbyterian ministers in this State.” He was born two
          years after passage of the Gradual Abolition Act in Pennsylvania, but
          he was born in New Jersey, which would not enact legislation to remove
          slavery from its borders until 1804. Fortunately, he was born free,
          and grew up learning the trade of shoemaking, which he abandoned in
          his mid-twenties to take up the life of an itinerant preacher. He also
          preached equality and self-respect, and he was a bitter opponent of
          colonization, which led to his persecution in the South. Gardiner narrowly
          escaped being jailed and possibly enslaved in Baltimore for his sermons,
          and sometime after 1830 he came to Philadelphia, where he continued
          his anti-slavery activities.  He first
          came to Harrisburg in 1837, to work with other African American leaders
          and activists to protest African American disenfranchisement, which
          was then being written into the state Constitution. Although he made
          other visits and maintained close contact with many Harrisburg black
          leaders throughout the next two decades, he did not settle in the state
          capital until 1858.44 In
          the last months of his life, while serving as pastor of the Second
          Presbyterian Church in Harrisburg, he witnessed the culmination of
          his life’s work: the beginning of the end of slavery in the United
          States.  Even at the
          time of his death, Gardiner was laboring to ensure that future generations
          would be provided for. Having lived for many years in poverty, and
          knowing too well the toll that debt and poverty exacted from the African
          American community, Reverend Gardiner was clearly pursuing plans to
          put his church on more sound financial footing.  Two weeks
          before he died, members of his congregation held a “fair” to
          raise funds for the church, and both city newspapers publicized the
          event on their pages. On 18 March 1863, the Telegraph reported, “The
          Colored People of Harrisburg held a grand fair last evening, in the
          old (colored) Presbyterian church, between Second and Front, for the
          purpose of raising a fund for the benefit of that church. The sum realized
          was very handsome, and the fair will be continued again this evening.” A
          few days later the same newspaper again put in a plug for the fair,
          noting, “This is a commendable enterprise, and as such it has
          our endorsement.”45 Even
          the normally anti-black Patriot and Union got behind the event,
          giving notice of the continued success of the fair, then in its second
          week: 
        The Colored Fair at
              the Walnut street Presbyterian church, commenced last week, will
              be continued for several days longer. The object is a commendable
              one, and thus far the exhibition has been quite liberally patronized
              by white citizens. A great variety of fancy articles are offered
              for sale, and refreshments are served up in a style to suit the
              taste of the most fastidious epicure.46 The quality
          of the foods for sale was no doubt influenced by the contributions
          of some of the town’s most successful African American caterers:
          Curry and Elizabeth Taylor, and James and Matilda Greenley. The Taylors
          and Matilda Greenley were all charter members of the church, having
          helped in its formation five years earlier. Curry Taylor and his family
          were still trying to recover from adversity, having lost their bakery
          and home to the actions of an arsonist during a plague of anti-black
          violence seven months earlier. Despite the crushing loss of property,
          he had managed to keep his fresh seafood and vegetable business going
          at the Market House on the square, and was probably one of the vendors,
          selling his award winning baked goods, at the Presbyterian Church Fair
          in March 1863.47  The congregation
          of the Second Presbyterian Church would not be able to share their
          fair’s success with their pastor for very long, however. Charles
          W. Gardiner died on Monday, 6 April 1863, and his body was taken to
          Philadelphia, where most of his family still lived, for his funeral
          and burial.48 The pastoral
          duties in the bereaved Second Presbyterian Church were taken over by
          charter member and ruling elder Hiram Baker.49  Reverend
          Gardiner was not the only leading anti-slavery activist that Harrisburg
          lost during this time, however. Joseph Bustill, having accomplished
          in Harrisburg what he had been sent to do—repair and reorganize
          the local Underground Railroad network—returned with his family
          to Philadelphia, where he immersed himself in political and social
          activism, as well as new business endeavors in partnership with his
          wife.50  Although
          the exact date of his departure from Harrisburg is not definitely known,
          it appears that he was absent by the time that a fugitive slave was
          paraded through the streets in April. With Gardiner and Bustill gone,
          the capital city was again without a central figure to direct its anti-slavery
          activists. Perhaps the coming of the war and the issuance of the President’s
          Proclamation caused anti-slavery activists to switch their focus to
          gaining the right to enlist for African Americans, and fugitive slaves,
          who still flocked to the north, were assumed to be mostly free from
          danger.  No crowds
          assembled in the streets of Harrisburg to protest this outrage, which
          flew in the face of the spirit of the celebrated Emancipation Proclamation,
          even though it was entirely legal according to that document because
          Maryland was not in a state of rebellion against the Union and her
          slaveholders could still lawfully hunt down their escaped bondsmen.
          No frantic telegrams passed between Harrisburg and Philadelphia and
          no riotous mobs stopped the slave hunter at the station; Harrisburg
          remained sedate and quiet on this beautiful spring day, while one more
          man lost his freedom.    Previous | Next   Notes32. “The
          First Installment,” Patriot and Union, 11 March 1863.
          Unfortunately, the “hotel” next to the station that served
          the fourteen African American recruits is not identified in the article.  33. “Negro
          Recruits,” Patriot and Union, 16 March 1863.  34. “More
          Negro Soldiers,” Patriot and Union, 17 March 1863.  35. Blackett, Thomas
            Morris Chester, 33-36. Chester was still nursing his ambitions
            of being appointed to an officer’s post as late as May 1863,
            when a Harrisburg newspaper reported, “We learn that Tom Chester,
            having taken an active part in the recruiting of the Massachusetts
            regiment, is promised an important position.” “Negro
            Soldiers,” Patriot and Union, 7 May 1863. That appointment
            to an officership with the Fifty-Fourth or Fifty-Fifth Massachusetts
            Volunteers would never come, however, as Governor Andrew stood firm
            in his opposition to African American officers in his state regiments.  36. “A
          Failure,” Patriot and Union, 25 March 1863.  37. “Negro
          Recruits,” Patriot and Union, 26 March 1863. I have
          cleaned up the quoted line to be less offensive in its stereotype of
          African American speech patterns.  38. Patriot
            and Union, 6 March 1863. The term “dornick,” as
            used in Pennsylvania, is a Scots-Irish term for a stone or rock too
            large to leave in a cultivated field, where it might damage a plow,
            but small enough to be thrown or hurled out of the field.  39. “Another
          Negro Assaulted,” Patriot and Union, 7 March 1863.  40. Patriot
            and Union, 28 March 1863.  41.	Ibid.  42. “Negro
          Rioters Arrested,” “Another Row,” Patriot and
          Union, 31 March 1863. In a jury trial at the Court of Quarter
          Sessions on 28 April, four of the seven arrested, Thomas Early, Jacob
          Jones, Boyd Jackson and Anne Greenley, were found guilty of riot. Charges
          against the other three persons had apparently been dropped. Patriot
          and Union, 29 April 1863.  43. Patriot
            and Union, 31 March 1863. The Patriot and Union complained
            about the lack of police presence in the black neighborhoods, not
            so much for the lack of protection for the local residents as for
            the lack of protection for whites who ventured in: “If white
            men will persist in visiting that dangerous locality after night,
            when under the influence of alcohol, and ‘kicking up a muss’ with
            the darkeys who congregate there in large numbers, they must put
            up with the consequences…the white man who intrudes upon and
            molests them is certain to be assaulted and roughly used. The disorderly
            scenes occurring so frequently in that section of the city, show
            the necessity for an additional police force, and we trust the new
            Mayor and Council will give [Chief of Police] Barney [Campbell] two
            or three reliable and efficient assistants.” No mention is
            made of the need for the Provost Marshal to keep drunken soldiers
            with riot and mayhem on their minds out of the African American neighborhoods.  44. Christian
            Recorder, 11 April 1863; Colored American, 10 June
            1837; National Era, 27 January 1848.  45. Pennsylvania
            Daily Telegraph, 18, 21 March 1863.  46. Patriot
            and Union, 24 March 1863.  47. By mid-1863,
          Curry Taylor had relocated his bakery and home to Forster Street, near
          Elder (modern day Capitol Street). This placed him about halfway between
          his old neighborhood near Tanner’s Alley and the relatively new
          African American neighborhood centered on Calder Street in Verbeketown.
          It is possible he was positioning himself to move into a stall in the
          partially finished West Harrisburg Market House on Broad Street (modern
          day Broad Street Market on Verbeke Street) upon its completion. Unfortunately,
          progress on the new market house was impeded by the demands of the
          war. Gopsill’s 1863-1864 Directory; Roe, Plan of
          the City of Harrisburg; Frew, Building Harrisburg, 45-48.  48. Christian
            Recorder, 11 April 1863. According to his obituary, services
            for Charles W. Gardiner were held at the Seventh Street Presbyterian
            Church in Philadelphia, then under the pastorship of Rev. Mifflin
            Gibbs. The Reverend William Catto, father of Octavius Catto, delivered
            the sermon and eulogy, and Gardiner was buried in a vault beside
            the church.  49. Gopsill’s
            1863-1864 Directory. Hiram Baker served as pastor of the Second
            Presbyterian Church from 1863-1869. During his years of service,
            the congregation moved from its rented room on Second Street to a
            permanent home at the southwest corner of Elder and Forster streets,
            building a wooden church at that location in 1866. It became known
            as the Elder Street Presbyterian Church after the move. That structure
            caught fire and burned to the ground in 1880, and the following year
            the congregation replaced it with a substantial stone church on the
            same location. Note that this is the approximate location to which
            church member Curry Taylor had moved in 1863. Stewart, Centennial
            Memorial, 165-166.  50. The exact
          date of Joseph Bustill’s removal to Philadelphia is not known,
          but occurred before the summer of 1863. He does not appear in the city
          directory, which was compiled by James Gopsill in the summer of 1863,
          and is listed as a resident of Philadelphia in a news article published
          in January 1864. By April 1864, he was in business with his wife, Sarah
          Humphries Bustill, as a hairdresser. The Bustills also made and sold
          wigs, braided hair and sold hair products. Gopsill’s 1863-1864
          Harrisburg Directory; Christian Recorder, 9 January,
          9 April 1864.
 |