Table
of Contents
Study
Areas:
Slavery
Anti-Slavery
Free
Persons of Color
Underground
Railroad
The
Violent Decade
US
Colored Troops
Civil
War
|
Chapter
Ten
The Bridge (continued)
The
Master Spirit of the Negro War Element
At
nine o’clock p.m. on Monday, 9 March, the evening
mail train from Pittsburgh pulled into the ornate brick and stone
Pennsylvania Railroad depot on Market Street in Harrisburg. The engine
sat steaming in the cool March temperatures as the crew of the train
worked to take in more fuel and water for the next leg of the trip.
Railroad employees unloaded the sacks of mail that originated in
the west, and loaded sacks bound for destinations to the east.
Among
the passengers that climbed down from the cars onto the passenger platform
were fourteen African American men, a few wearing the blue wool army
uniform of the North. They stood out among the other travelers by their
demeanor and build, not to mention their uniforms, which were easily
distinguishable even in the dim light from the gas lamps that illuminate
the platform and lined Market Street.
A
considerable stir began among the depot workers, some of whom were
African American locals, and word quickly spread through the city of
the arrival of a number of black troops. One of the men wore the insignia
of an officer, and after inquiring about local accommodations, led
his men across the street to a hotel whose owner was affable to providing
black men with a little something to wash the taste of locomotive soot
from their throats.
They
were greeted in the street and in the hotel, during their brief stay,
by local black residents, for whom the appearance of the Pittsburgh
volunteers was an unexpected and welcome sight. Here the Patriot
and Union picked up the story:
Quite a number of “American
citizens of African descent” belonging to this city paid
their respects to the distinguished visitors, and gave them a warm
and hearty greeting. We learn that the effort making here to secure
negro recruits is not meeting with that success our Abolition friends
desire, and the probabilities are that the whole thing will fizzle
out. In Pittsburgh the greatest exertions are being made to raise
a regiment of sable soldiers, but so far their efforts have only
secured the paltry fourteen that passed through this city on Monday
evening.32
Although the
Democratic editor of the Patriot and Union was being heavily
sarcastic by referring to the fourteen African American soldiers as “distinguished
visitors,” the appellation was particularly apt as far as local
blacks were concerned. This was the first time during the war that
the city had seen uniformed African American recruits, and not just
army drovers, wagoners and other workers who wore the Union blue.
Although
local whites may have been dismayed to see these men marching from
the depot to the local restaurant for refreshments while the train
was readied for its run east, the sight was a perfect sensation for
Harrisburg’s African American residents. Here was the living,
breathing, beer-drinking embodiment of everything they had imagined
when the idea of African American troops was first advanced in the
early years of the war. For a few glorious moments, they could talk
to them, clap them on the back and wish them well, sit down with them,
and maybe even buy a drink for them before they walked back to their
eastbound train.
By the end
of the next week, though, Harrisburg’s African American community
could proudly boast that it, too, was sending its sons and husbands
to Boston to join the Fifty-Fourth regiment. The appearance of the
Pittsburgh men must have finally sparked an outcry to establish a recruiting
station in the capital city, and once that happened, it drew an immediate
response. A number of Harrisburg men came forward to speak with T.
Morris Chester, who took the lead in the local recruiting effort, about
the Massachusetts regiment, and of those whose spirit was willing,
Chester and his co-recruiter John Wolf found their first recruits:
On Saturday morning
Sergeant Thomas M. Chester, the master spirit of the negro war
element in our midst, left here with six or eight stalwart “American
citizens of African descent,” recruited for a Massachusetts
regiment. He left a sable sergeant in charge of the recruiting
station during his absence, who has succeeded in enlisting more
negroes for the same regiment, and they will also be sent forward
in the course of a few days.33
On Tuesday,
17 March, a local newspaper reported, “Another squad of negro
soldiers, recruited in the western section of the State for a Massachusetts
regiment, passed through this city yesterday. The sable sons of Mars
were in full uniform and looked quite ferocious.” Whether this
group of recruits aroused the same interest among the city’s
black residents, as did the first group, is not mentioned. The newspaper
did credit the work of T. Morris Chester in the local recruitment work,
noting: “The zealous and ambitious Tom Chester, of this city,
is working hard to get up a company, with the view of being commissioned
as captain, and no doubt he will succeed.” 34
Although
he no doubt cringed at being identified as “Tom Chester,” the
newspaper editor, in his disparagement of Chester’s motivation,
was accurate in assessing his ambitions. Thomas Morris Chester indeed
had dreams of leading an African American regiment as an officer. Although
he knew that the planned Massachusetts regiments were to be led only
by white officers, Chester also knew that the inequities in pay and
bounty—black soldiers would be paid only ten dollars per month,
with a monthly deduction of three dollars for equipment, as compared
with the thirteen dollars and no deductions paid monthly to white recruits—were
being assailed by the New England abolitionists who backed the regiments,
and the pay issue was under review by Governor Andrew. Chester probably
also hoped that the ban on black officers would also be reviewed and
lifted, and he was working to be in a prime position to be appointed
to one of those spots.35
By the end
of March, excitement in the city over seeing African American men passing
through, or volunteering locally for the Massachusetts regiments was,
in the words of the Patriot and Union editor, “played
out.” Ever eager to show the folly in enlisting African Americans
into the armed forces, the Democratic press happily published articles
about the slow recruiting efforts almost weekly. Unfortunately for
those seeking to fill the ranks of the Fifty-Fourth regiment, the reports
were not substantially exaggerated. On 25 March, the Patriot and
Union pronounced the local recruitment push “a failure”:
The effort of the Abolitionists
to get up a negro regiment is likely to prove a failure. After
all the drumming up that has been done in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania
and New York, only two hundred and fifty-four recruits have been
obtained. Great inducements are offered to negroes to enlist, but
they “don’t see it.” Tom Chester, of this city,
undertook to raise a company, with the view of being commissioned
as captain, but finding that he couldn’t make his point,
abandoned the effort. There is no fight in the niggers, and they
can’t be got into the ranks of the army except by conscription.36
The next day,
the same newspaper reported on the supposed reason that most of Harrisburg’s
black men were shunning Chester’s advocacy of the Massachusetts
Governor’s opportunity to fight in his regiment. It printed a
story it heard about the retort made by one local African American
man to the Massachusetts recruiter who tried to enlist him. He supposedly
told the recruiter that he, and his fellow Harrisburg blacks, had nothing
to do with the war, making the allusion “two dogs fight over
a bone—did you ever see the bone fight?”37 The
editor clearly wanted to ascribe the same motives to the local black
community that matched his political views: that the war was not about
slavery, as the President’s Proclamation announced, or even over “social
equality doctrines” (as it termed African American rights), but
was a basic fight over states rights.
In the view
of the Democratic press, blacks were simply being pushed into the fight
by desperate abolitionists. To prove its point, the Patriot and
Union editor juxtaposed articles about fights between local African
American and white citizens with the recruiting articles, to highlight
the supposed socially corrosive effects of elevating blacks to the
social status of whites by allowing them to enlist in the military.
Along with the article on the Pittsburgh recruitment efforts, it ran
an article under the headline “Irrepressible Conflict”:
The “Irrepressible
Conflict” between whites and blacks still goes on. Yesterday
a stalwart “American of African descent,” employed
as a porter at the White Hall hotel, was assaulted by a white man
who struck him on the head with a solid “dornick,” inflicting
an ugly gash from which the blood flowed in such a profuse stream
as to completely saturate his clothing. The assault was provoked
by alleged insolence on the part of the negro, who “put on
airs” and indulged in language that the white man wouldn’t
submit to. Scenes of this description, now of frequent occurrence,
will become still more numerous in this and other northern cities.38
A day later
the Patriot and Union followed with another article about
an assault on a local African American citizen who “perambulated
the streets, flourishing a loaded cane and insulting “white trash.” When
he was challenged and belittled by a group of young white men on Third
Street, he “indulged in defiant language and assumed a defensive
attitude,” but was chased down into Blackberry Alley, where a
white passerby came to his defense, but was subsequently frightened
off with threats from the gang of street toughs.
The Patriot
and Union called upon “good law-abiding citizens to frown
upon such lawless proceedings,” even though it laid blame for
instigating the incident upon the black man for his “provocation” of
the street gang. This led to a bit of editorializing on what the
editor saw as the true cause of the trouble, which was abolitionism:
The frequent outrages
of this kind occurring here and elsewhere furnish unmistakable
evidence of an “irrepressible conflict” between the
white and black races, engendered by the Abolition policy of emancipating
the negro slaves and elevating the whole African race in this country
to social and political equality with white citizens. And if the
present policy of the Abolition agents prevails, this “conflict” will
go on, just as certainly as effect follows cause, until all negroes
shall have been driven beyond the borders of the free States or
totally exterminated.39
T. Morris
Chester’s job got considerably tougher as March progressed. Republican
politician William Henry Seward delivered the phrase “irrepressible
conflict between opposing and enduring forces” in an 1858 speech
to represent what he viewed as the inevitable economic clash between
a slaveholding nation and a free-labor nation. Once war came, the Democratic
press gleefully turned the phrase on its head to represent what they
viewed as the inevitable violent showdown for dominance between whites
and blacks—a showdown that they believed was precipitated by
the policies of emancipation and military enlistment.
In Harrisburg,
those clashes were of a minor character through the winter months,
generally involving isolated fights between a few people, with the
African Americans usually ending up as the victims. Such reports were
served up as morality tales for the opponents of abolition, supposedly
pointing out the evils and pitfalls that awaited any African American
residents foolish enough to “put on airs” and act as if
they had the same rights as local white residents.
While such
incidents were a nuisance, an insult, and even a danger when they left
local African American residents with physical injuries, they were
still isolated and involved few people. With the coming of spring,
however, the potential for violence increased along with the numbers
of soldiers who reported for duty at Camp Curtin. Many of those soldiers
carried the same views as the editors of the Patriot and Union,
and most, when they inevitably encountered Harrisburg’s black
residents, kept their views to themselves and avoided trouble. A few,
though, were unable to stifle their words or actions, and very soon
found their “irrepressible conflict.”
South Street Heats Up
Spring 1863
arrived in Harrisburg in a typically cold and rainy fashion, perhaps
even colder and rainier than usual, causing local newspaper editors
to comment, at the end of March at the atypical lack of budding evident
in area trees. The abundant rains had swelled local streams, which
in turn fed the Susquehanna River to the point that, by the last weekend
of March, it was threatening to overflow its banks, as was its habit.
Driftwood covered the waters that flowed swiftly past the capital city,
reminding residents that the large rafts of timber from the northern
counties along the West Branch would soon be making an appearance.40
Soldiers
were again filtering into Camp Curtin, many of them newly recruited
over the winter by agents sent home from their regiments for just such
a purpose. One of them, an apparently contentious private named J.
M. Sweeny, wandered into the rather rough neighborhood behind the State
Capitol building, and got into an argument with local barber Thomas
Early.
The cause
of their argument is not known, but it was severe enough that it quickly
degenerated into a physical confrontation that spilled out onto South
Street. A crowd had no sooner gathered around the two feuding men when
Sweeney pulled out a billy club and whacked Early hard enough on the
head to draw blood. This was a severe mistake for the lone soldier,
who was vastly outnumbered by the friends and acquaintances of the
forty-five-year-old barber and long time city resident.
Sweeny was
quickly overwhelmed by a number of men in the crowd, who beat him with
clubs, stones, and whatever was handy and heavy. A number of women
in the crowd cheered on the men who were beating the soldier, telling
them, “Here’s a razor, cut his damned heart out.” The
spectators surrounding the fight rapidly increased to a mob of more
than a hundred, as people ran to the scene to see what all the excitement
and yelling was about. Within moments the fight between a lone soldier
and a lone resident of South Street had escalated to a near riot that
quickly drew the attention of the police.
Bernard “Barney” Campbell
was in his first day on the job as Harrisburg’s new chief of
police, having just been appointed by the newly elected Mayor Augustus
L. Roumfort. The new mayor, a Democrat, had taken office only days
before and had just finished pledging before City Council to make the
city’s safety his top priority. To underscore his sincerity,
Roumfort announced the appointment of Campbell, a thirty-one-year-old
native of Ireland, to the position of chief of police.
When news
of the brawl in South Street reached the Mayor’s office in the
Exchange Building on Walnut Street, a distance of only a few city blocks,
Campbell dutifully raced to the scene with a handful of officers in
support. When Campbell arrived, he found “hundreds of spectators
of all colors and ages” surrounding the knot of struggling men,
with many of those at the core of the conflict screaming to the fighters
to inflict even more damage. The new police chief waded into the fray
himself, physically disentangling people in order to get to the center
of the fight. His men followed and “with some difficulty” the
tumult was finally quieted.
Campbell
found the soldier, who was severely beaten and profusely bleeding from
deep razor cuts, and immediately had him taken to the office of a nearby
doctor. He then ordered his men to arrest the three African American
men he had seen beating the soldier. They were taken before Alderman
Kline for a hearing, but when Kline heard their stories about how Sweeny
had struck first, he decided not to charge them with any crimes and
let them go home.
Meanwhile,
Campbell and his men had their hands full just keeping order in the
neighborhood of South Street, as a large number of soldiers had by
now made their appearance, having heard that one of their comrades
had gotten himself into considerable trouble.41 Once
the sun began to set, however, tempers cooled along with the air temperature,
and people turned toward home and camp to nurse wounds and, unfortunately,
grudges.
The feud
continued on Sunday night, as the bandaged Sweeny, at the behest of
a local white man named Adam Kremer, pressed charges against seven
African American residents of the South Street area. Charged with riot
and assault and battery with intent to kill were Thomas Early, Jacob
Lee, Jacob Jones, Boyd Jackson, Zachariah Johnson, Samuel Bennett,
and Ann Greenley. Unlike Friday afternoon, the charges were not dismissed
this time, and each of the seven accused rioters was forced to post
four hundred dollars bail.42
The arrests
may have been made in retaliation for a different incident that happened
the night of the arrests, when a different drunken soldier ventured
onto South Street and ended up being beaten by a number of black men
in the neighborhood. From the newspaper report of the second incident
in the same location, it appears that the second soldier had come to
the African American neighborhood with revenge on his mind, but instead
encountered more resistance than he had anticipated.
Unfortunately,
a number of the more naive soldiers in camp believed the articles that
they read almost daily in their local Democratic newspapers about the
supposed cowardice of African Americans, and, after an afternoon of
drinking, allowed bravado to overcome reason, and they set out for
Harrisburg’s African American neighborhoods to prove their own
valor.
After numerous
incidents like this, and with few police available in those neighborhoods
to intercept the drunken crusaders,43 local
residents had finally had enough of the abuse, both verbal and physical,
and they simply started giving the uniformed invaders a good drubbing.
This defensive action was what the Patriot and Union characterized
as “insolence on the part of the negro,” an assessment
shared by the newly elected mayor and chief of police, and which resulted
in the arrest of community leaders, such as Samuel Bennett, Thomas
Early, Zachariah Johnson—all of whom were leaders at the Bethel
A.M.E. on Watch Night—because of the misadventures of a few drunken
soldiers.
Loss of Two
Leaders
The black
community suffered another blow on the day after Easter, with the death
of the Reverend Charles C. Gardiner, pastor of the Second Presbyterian
Church. His health had been failing for some time, but his tireless
spirit overcame any limitations, so that his congregation probably
thought he would be around almost forever.
At eighty-one
years old, his obituary noted, “Brother Gardiner was one of the
oldest Presbyterian ministers in this State.” He was born two
years after passage of the Gradual Abolition Act in Pennsylvania, but
he was born in New Jersey, which would not enact legislation to remove
slavery from its borders until 1804. Fortunately, he was born free,
and grew up learning the trade of shoemaking, which he abandoned in
his mid-twenties to take up the life of an itinerant preacher. He also
preached equality and self-respect, and he was a bitter opponent of
colonization, which led to his persecution in the South. Gardiner narrowly
escaped being jailed and possibly enslaved in Baltimore for his sermons,
and sometime after 1830 he came to Philadelphia, where he continued
his anti-slavery activities.
He first
came to Harrisburg in 1837, to work with other African American leaders
and activists to protest African American disenfranchisement, which
was then being written into the state Constitution. Although he made
other visits and maintained close contact with many Harrisburg black
leaders throughout the next two decades, he did not settle in the state
capital until 1858.44 In
the last months of his life, while serving as pastor of the Second
Presbyterian Church in Harrisburg, he witnessed the culmination of
his life’s work: the beginning of the end of slavery in the United
States.
Even at the
time of his death, Gardiner was laboring to ensure that future generations
would be provided for. Having lived for many years in poverty, and
knowing too well the toll that debt and poverty exacted from the African
American community, Reverend Gardiner was clearly pursuing plans to
put his church on more sound financial footing.
Two weeks
before he died, members of his congregation held a “fair” to
raise funds for the church, and both city newspapers publicized the
event on their pages. On 18 March 1863, the Telegraph reported, “The
Colored People of Harrisburg held a grand fair last evening, in the
old (colored) Presbyterian church, between Second and Front, for the
purpose of raising a fund for the benefit of that church. The sum realized
was very handsome, and the fair will be continued again this evening.” A
few days later the same newspaper again put in a plug for the fair,
noting, “This is a commendable enterprise, and as such it has
our endorsement.”45 Even
the normally anti-black Patriot and Union got behind the event,
giving notice of the continued success of the fair, then in its second
week:
The Colored Fair at
the Walnut street Presbyterian church, commenced last week, will
be continued for several days longer. The object is a commendable
one, and thus far the exhibition has been quite liberally patronized
by white citizens. A great variety of fancy articles are offered
for sale, and refreshments are served up in a style to suit the
taste of the most fastidious epicure.46
The quality
of the foods for sale was no doubt influenced by the contributions
of some of the town’s most successful African American caterers:
Curry and Elizabeth Taylor, and James and Matilda Greenley. The Taylors
and Matilda Greenley were all charter members of the church, having
helped in its formation five years earlier. Curry Taylor and his family
were still trying to recover from adversity, having lost their bakery
and home to the actions of an arsonist during a plague of anti-black
violence seven months earlier. Despite the crushing loss of property,
he had managed to keep his fresh seafood and vegetable business going
at the Market House on the square, and was probably one of the vendors,
selling his award winning baked goods, at the Presbyterian Church Fair
in March 1863.47
The congregation
of the Second Presbyterian Church would not be able to share their
fair’s success with their pastor for very long, however. Charles
W. Gardiner died on Monday, 6 April 1863, and his body was taken to
Philadelphia, where most of his family still lived, for his funeral
and burial.48 The pastoral
duties in the bereaved Second Presbyterian Church were taken over by
charter member and ruling elder Hiram Baker.49
Reverend
Gardiner was not the only leading anti-slavery activist that Harrisburg
lost during this time, however. Joseph Bustill, having accomplished
in Harrisburg what he had been sent to do—repair and reorganize
the local Underground Railroad network—returned with his family
to Philadelphia, where he immersed himself in political and social
activism, as well as new business endeavors in partnership with his
wife.50
Although
the exact date of his departure from Harrisburg is not definitely known,
it appears that he was absent by the time that a fugitive slave was
paraded through the streets in April. With Gardiner and Bustill gone,
the capital city was again without a central figure to direct its anti-slavery
activists. Perhaps the coming of the war and the issuance of the President’s
Proclamation caused anti-slavery activists to switch their focus to
gaining the right to enlist for African Americans, and fugitive slaves,
who still flocked to the north, were assumed to be mostly free from
danger.
No crowds
assembled in the streets of Harrisburg to protest this outrage, which
flew in the face of the spirit of the celebrated Emancipation Proclamation,
even though it was entirely legal according to that document because
Maryland was not in a state of rebellion against the Union and her
slaveholders could still lawfully hunt down their escaped bondsmen.
No frantic telegrams passed between Harrisburg and Philadelphia and
no riotous mobs stopped the slave hunter at the station; Harrisburg
remained sedate and quiet on this beautiful spring day, while one more
man lost his freedom.
Previous | Next
Notes
32. “The
First Installment,” Patriot and Union, 11 March 1863.
Unfortunately, the “hotel” next to the station that served
the fourteen African American recruits is not identified in the article.
33. “Negro
Recruits,” Patriot and Union, 16 March 1863.
34. “More
Negro Soldiers,” Patriot and Union, 17 March 1863.
35. Blackett, Thomas
Morris Chester, 33-36. Chester was still nursing his ambitions
of being appointed to an officer’s post as late as May 1863,
when a Harrisburg newspaper reported, “We learn that Tom Chester,
having taken an active part in the recruiting of the Massachusetts
regiment, is promised an important position.” “Negro
Soldiers,” Patriot and Union, 7 May 1863. That appointment
to an officership with the Fifty-Fourth or Fifty-Fifth Massachusetts
Volunteers would never come, however, as Governor Andrew stood firm
in his opposition to African American officers in his state regiments.
36. “A
Failure,” Patriot and Union, 25 March 1863.
37. “Negro
Recruits,” Patriot and Union, 26 March 1863. I have
cleaned up the quoted line to be less offensive in its stereotype of
African American speech patterns.
38. Patriot
and Union, 6 March 1863. The term “dornick,” as
used in Pennsylvania, is a Scots-Irish term for a stone or rock too
large to leave in a cultivated field, where it might damage a plow,
but small enough to be thrown or hurled out of the field.
39. “Another
Negro Assaulted,” Patriot and Union, 7 March 1863.
40. Patriot
and Union, 28 March 1863.
41. Ibid.
42. “Negro
Rioters Arrested,” “Another Row,” Patriot and
Union, 31 March 1863. In a jury trial at the Court of Quarter
Sessions on 28 April, four of the seven arrested, Thomas Early, Jacob
Jones, Boyd Jackson and Anne Greenley, were found guilty of riot. Charges
against the other three persons had apparently been dropped. Patriot
and Union, 29 April 1863.
43. Patriot
and Union, 31 March 1863. The Patriot and Union complained
about the lack of police presence in the black neighborhoods, not
so much for the lack of protection for the local residents as for
the lack of protection for whites who ventured in: “If white
men will persist in visiting that dangerous locality after night,
when under the influence of alcohol, and ‘kicking up a muss’ with
the darkeys who congregate there in large numbers, they must put
up with the consequences…the white man who intrudes upon and
molests them is certain to be assaulted and roughly used. The disorderly
scenes occurring so frequently in that section of the city, show
the necessity for an additional police force, and we trust the new
Mayor and Council will give [Chief of Police] Barney [Campbell] two
or three reliable and efficient assistants.” No mention is
made of the need for the Provost Marshal to keep drunken soldiers
with riot and mayhem on their minds out of the African American neighborhoods.
44. Christian
Recorder, 11 April 1863; Colored American, 10 June
1837; National Era, 27 January 1848.
45. Pennsylvania
Daily Telegraph, 18, 21 March 1863.
46. Patriot
and Union, 24 March 1863.
47. By mid-1863,
Curry Taylor had relocated his bakery and home to Forster Street, near
Elder (modern day Capitol Street). This placed him about halfway between
his old neighborhood near Tanner’s Alley and the relatively new
African American neighborhood centered on Calder Street in Verbeketown.
It is possible he was positioning himself to move into a stall in the
partially finished West Harrisburg Market House on Broad Street (modern
day Broad Street Market on Verbeke Street) upon its completion. Unfortunately,
progress on the new market house was impeded by the demands of the
war. Gopsill’s 1863-1864 Directory; Roe, Plan of
the City of Harrisburg; Frew, Building Harrisburg, 45-48.
48. Christian
Recorder, 11 April 1863. According to his obituary, services
for Charles W. Gardiner were held at the Seventh Street Presbyterian
Church in Philadelphia, then under the pastorship of Rev. Mifflin
Gibbs. The Reverend William Catto, father of Octavius Catto, delivered
the sermon and eulogy, and Gardiner was buried in a vault beside
the church.
49. Gopsill’s
1863-1864 Directory. Hiram Baker served as pastor of the Second
Presbyterian Church from 1863-1869. During his years of service,
the congregation moved from its rented room on Second Street to a
permanent home at the southwest corner of Elder and Forster streets,
building a wooden church at that location in 1866. It became known
as the Elder Street Presbyterian Church after the move. That structure
caught fire and burned to the ground in 1880, and the following year
the congregation replaced it with a substantial stone church on the
same location. Note that this is the approximate location to which
church member Curry Taylor had moved in 1863. Stewart, Centennial
Memorial, 165-166.
50. The exact
date of Joseph Bustill’s removal to Philadelphia is not known,
but occurred before the summer of 1863. He does not appear in the city
directory, which was compiled by James Gopsill in the summer of 1863,
and is listed as a resident of Philadelphia in a news article published
in January 1864. By April 1864, he was in business with his wife, Sarah
Humphries Bustill, as a hairdresser. The Bustills also made and sold
wigs, braided hair and sold hair products. Gopsill’s 1863-1864
Harrisburg Directory; Christian Recorder, 9 January,
9 April 1864.
|